M4 · Recalibrating the AI Revolution
How to Build, Use, and Govern AI on Africa's Terms
Half-day interactive workshop · eLearning Africa 2026 · Wed 3 June 2026 · 09:00–12:30 · Room Adinkra
Facilitators: Dr Ronda Železný-Green (UK) · Habib Houndekindo (Senegal)
Facilitators: Dr Ronda Železný-Green (UK) · Habib Houndekindo (Senegal)
Where Data & Democracy Meet
Everything in this companion works offline and stays in your browser. Nothing you type is sent anywhere — your notes, tool assessment and roadmap are saved on this device only. Use Print / Save as PDF at the bottom to keep a copy.
Today is not about how to use one more tool. It is about governing AI on your own terms: deciding the purpose, the limits, who is accountable, and whose knowledge counts.
Agenda
| Time | Block | What happens |
|---|---|---|
| 09:00 | Welcome & orientation | Objectives, ground rules, framing question |
| 09:15 | Session 1 · Beyond access | A governance-first lens on AI + discussion |
| 10:00 | Session 2 · Interrogating AI tools | Hands-on tool review in small groups |
| 10:45 | Coffee break | 15 minutes |
| 11:00 | Session 3 · Your AI roadmap | Draft your one-page institutional roadmap |
| 12:00 | Peer review & synthesis | Exchange roadmaps, plenary, next steps |
The governance-first framework
1 · Local knowledge as expertise
Treat community, indigenous and frontline knowledge as primary data — not decoration.2 · Institutional readiness
People, policy and infrastructure in place before a tool is adopted.3 · Accountability
Who decided, who is responsible, and how do we review and challenge?4 · Data stewardship
Named roles for how data is collected, stored, shared, protected and retired.Framing question
What does it mean to govern AI rather than merely use it?
Dependency–agency spectrum
Passive consumerUses whatever is given. No questions about data, bias or cost.
Cautious userSenses risks but has no process; relies on goodwill.
Active managerHas rules: checks outputs, manages data, trains staff.
Governance leaderSets purpose & limits, names roles, holds tools accountable.
Using generative AI critically
A tool is never accountable for an output — a named person is. Tick what you'll commit to.
Before you prompt
Decide if AI is even the right tool for this task.
Never paste personal, confidential or community data you can't share.
Know where the tool sends your input.
While you work
Treat every output as a draft, not a fact.
Ask for sources — then verify them yourself.
Test in local languages and local context.
Watch for confident, invented detail.
Before you trust or send
Fact-check names, numbers, quotes, laws, citations.
Check for bias: whose voice is centred or missing?
Name the human accountable for the final output.
Disclose AI use where it matters.
AI tool assessment
Interrogate one real AI tool. Write evidence, not opinions. Saved on this device
My institutional AI roadmap
One page, six sections. Rough and real beats polished and empty. Name people, not “the team”.
| Action | Owner (name) | By when |
|---|---|---|
Next steps & resources
Keep the practice alive
- Run your first tool review within 2 weeks.
- Name your data steward this month.
- Start a monthly 30-min “AI clinic”.
- Revisit your roadmap each quarter.
Learn with datocracy
- Join datocracy's community of practice.
- Explore datocracy's learning offers on data & AI.
- Ask about the people-centred AI ethics framework.
- Follow the Africa AI Literacy Movement.
Stay connected
- Swap contacts with two people today.
- Pair with a peer organisation for accountability.
- Share your roadmap with your leadership.
- Tell us how it goes — we learn from you.
Contact: learn@datocracy.ai · datocracy — Where Data & Democracy Meet
Workshop materials & downloads
Access the full workshop slide deck, handouts, templates and reference materials from the shared drive.
Download session materials
Open Google Drive folder →
Your entries are stored only in this browser.